Comment 23 for bug 227945

On 12/09/2008 03:32 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 07:11:45AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote:
>> On 12/08/2008 09:21 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
>>> Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 01:56:01, John Vivirito a écrit :
>>>> Added Ubuntu task and assigned asac to review and push as needed
>>>>
>>> There is already iceweasel-firegpg in unstable/main and jaunty/universe.
>>> Isn't it a better idea to merge it instead of repackaging it from
>>> scratch?
>>>
>> We dont use iceweasel we use abrowser. We shouldnt have to fix each of
>
> Where did I say that we use iceweasel?
>
>> the iceweasel packages to support other browsers since at this time it
>> only depends on iceweasel and the packages are not updated but ours
>> are.
>
> Right, I understand (this looks like duplicate work though). Then you may
> want to drop from the archive several iceweasel-* packages that landed in
> jaunty.
>
>> We dont merge any mozilla apps from debian and we havee it so they get
>> our packages.
>
> "it" == firegpg?
> "they" == debian?
> Why would Debian get our firegpg package?
>
I have already filied a bug to remove the 4 iceweasel apps from Jaunty
archives. bug #306229 is the bug that i filed to remove them.

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from UnforgivenIII