APTonCD crashes

Same happens to me am using ubuntu intrepid 8.10 alfa, and it crashes when it hits around 43% but i did notice somthing odd. when it crashes i in the terminal i get this error "FATAL -> Failed to fork. ". Since i noticed it crashed i ran it by the terminal so i can see why it crashed.

Hope that helps

Trying to find the problem and I will work on a fix as soon as possible

Please upload the crash report ubuntu generated. In case you already dismissed it, you can rerun apport by executing

touch /var/crash/_usr_bin_aptoncd.*.crash

Afterwards, let apport upload the crash report and tell us here about the new bug number.
Thanks,

i have the same problem. aptoncd just vanishes in the middle while reading the packages at around 40-60%.
it has made this software pretty useless . it used to be fine in hardy.

But this behavior is typically seen when the number of packages are very high eg. around 700.

on running aptoncd in the terminal i get the following output.

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
FATAL -> Failed to fork.

i ran the command touch /var/crash/_usr_bin_aptoncd.*.crash
nothing happens. and the file is empty.

Does anybody had the same issue on hardy?

2008/10/6 manishmahabir <email address hidden>

> i have the same problem. aptoncd just vanishes in the middle while reading
> the packages at around 40-60%.
> it has made this software pretty useless . it used to be fine in hardy.
>
> But this behavior is typically seen when the number of packages are very
> high eg. around 700.
>
> on running aptoncd in the terminal i get the following output.
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> FATAL -> Failed to fork.
>
> i ran the command touch /var/crash/_usr_bin_aptoncd.*.crash
> nothing happens. and the file is empty.
>
> --
> APTonCD crashes
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272509
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laudeci Oliveira
Official Ubuntu Member
Red Hat Certified Technician
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Tecnólogo em Sistema de Informação

Laudeci is working on a fix for that.

Hi,

Could you guys, that were experiencing the problem, install the attached package and see if the problem still persists?

Every feedback is very welcome.

Thanks for your time.
Regards.

Hi,

this is fixed now.

Thanks,

Thomas

thomas@thomas-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd ; uname -a ; apt-cache policy linux linux-image linux-source-2.6.27 linux-headers-generic linux-restricted-modules aptoncd gnome-terminal network-manager apport-gtk ; hwinfo +all log=hw_log
Description: Ubuntu intrepid (development branch)
Release: 8.10
Linux thomas-laptop 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Fri Oct 10 03:55:24 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
linux:
  Installed: 2.6.27.7.8
  Candidate: 2.6.27.7.8
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27.7.8 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/restricted Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
linux-image:
  Installed: 2.6.27.7.8
  Candidate: 2.6.27.7.8
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27.7.8 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
linux-source-2.6.27:
  Installed: 2.6.27-7.10
  Candidate: 2.6.27-7.10
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27-7.10 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
linux-headers-generic:
  Installed: 2.6.27.7.8
  Candidate: 2.6.27.7.8
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27.7.8 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
linux-restricted-modules:
  Installed: 2.6.27.7.8
  Candidate: 2.6.27.7.8
  Version table:
 *** 2.6.27.7.8 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/restricted Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
aptoncd:
  Installed: 0.1.98-0ubuntu4
  Candidate: 0.1.98-0ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 0.1.98-0ubuntu4 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.1.98-0ubuntu3 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/universe Packages
gnome-terminal:
  Installed: 2.24.0-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 2.24.0-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 2.24.0-0ubuntu1 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
network-manager:
  Installed: 0.7~~svn20081008t224042-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 0.7~~svn20081008t224042-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 0.7~~svn20081008t224042-0ubuntu2 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
apport-gtk:
  Installed: 0.117
  Candidate: 0.117
  Version table:
 *** 0.117 0
        500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
thomas@thomas-laptop:~$

 tdflander, can you take some screenshot of memory consuption now????

please, with only aptoncd running :D

2008/10/13 Laudeci Oliveira <email address hidden>

>
>
> tdflander, can you take some screenshot of memory consuption now????
>
>

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laudeci Oliveira
Official Ubuntu Member
Red Hat Certified Technician
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Tecnólogo em Sistema de Informação

Hi Rafael,

so thanks for the good work. For me this is fixed now. The .xsession-errors file still gives some errors, but I have not experienced any. You can compare the memory behaviour with the screenshots in my other bugs:

#263572
#267633
#177130

I mean the screenshot now, after the fix.

Hi there Laudeci,

also thank you to you.

The screenshots in this bug report were all after the fix.

Our last two messages must have crossed.

Sorry about that.

I can do sudo apt-get remove aptoncd, to make new screenshots of the previous thing? Or maybe an Strace? I will check the image tommorow to check if it is not corrupt. I made two images actually, the second one with no other applications running. The pattern is the same, two parallel lines for RAM and swap, and only one of my dual cores (CPU) is used, all is written away to the SATA Hitachi hard disk. In the previous version all was written away to the RAM. I had noticed this because I had to remove one of my two 2 GB memory chips, since the BIOS provided by Acer would not allow for 4 GB, as it was preinstalled with Vista 32-bit, although officially they advertised it could do that. After I removed one of the chips, some bugs disappeared, but the aptoncd thing just occured more rapidly, hence it had to be the RAM usage by aptoncd, but it is fixed now.

Thanks,

Thomas.

Thank you for your you comments and reports. I asked to see another
screenshot because I noticed a lot of applications running.

But now you just told me what I wanted to know.

Thank you for reporting APTonCD bugs.

Laudeci Oliveira

Hi there,

I think you can change this to fix commited. I used my rsync image and my aptoncd image to install 8.10 beta on VirtualBox 2.0.2 under 8.10 beta (also). I could not use the restore unfortunately, since I did not download your patch, but did a clean install through gdebi. I was using my huawei 169 modem in roaming mode at the time and it was malfunctioning. Anyway, I will now reinstall my system as I have broken it. I suspect all will go fine, I will report back in a couple of hours.

Cheers,

Thomas

Hi there,

Sorry it took me so long. As I suspected everything went smooth. I reinstalled from rsynced 8.10 beta cd and an aptoncd image of 2 GB. The only problem was really that the dbg and dbgsym debugging symbol packages were not reinstalled. Is there a way to fix this? I now have to run '$ apt-cache search <package*name> | grep "dbg"' and reinstall all dbg packages manually. Thanks for the great work and please include the patch in the final release!

Cheers,

Thomas

please include the patch in the final release.
the problem was still there in the intrepid release client.as on 28th october.
my apt-cache is abour 1.3 GB and Aptoncd crashed at around 45% while making a cd.

for getting the fix into intrepid, we need a debdiff and someone to follow the SRU policy [1].

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates

I can provide a debdiff by saturday.

Rafael Proença
http://www.ubuntu-br.org

Phew !!!
Installing "aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb" just solved my problem...Now am better off with it...Thanks Rafael

I installed Intrepid and now are trying to create a disc with this application but when is reading the packages from the cache, hangs again and again and never works...

Crash all times

(sorry for my bad English)

is there a problem?

Thank you.-

Is Fixed!

Is working OK with the new version! http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb

Thank you.-

https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptoncd/+bug/292914

the source code version works

root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas# lsb_release -rd ; uname -a ; apt-cache policy aptoncd
Description: Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release: 9.04
Linux thomas-laptop 2.6.28-3-generic #4-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 12 22:48:15 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
aptoncd:
  Installed: 0.1.98-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 0.1.98-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 0.1.98-0ubuntu3 0
        500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas#

root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas# aptoncd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
FATAL -> Failed to fork.
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas# aptoncd -v
0.1.98-0ubuntu3
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas#

root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas# lsb_release -rd ; uname -a ; apt-cache policy aptoncd
Description: Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release: 9.04
Linux thomas-laptop 2.6.28-3-generic #4-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 12 22:48:15 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
aptoncd:
  Installed: 0.1.98-0ubuntu4
  Candidate: 0.1.98-0ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 0.1.98-0ubuntu4 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.1.98-0ubuntu3 0
        500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas#

Linux thomas-laptop 2.6.28-3-generic #4-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 12 22:48:15 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
aptoncd:
  Installed: 0.1.98-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 0.1.98-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 0.1.98-0ubuntu3 0
        500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas# aptoncd
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/apt/__init__.py:18: FutureWarning: apt API not stable yet
  warnings.warn("apt API not stable yet", FutureWarning)
Create Meta: True
root@thomas-laptop:/home/thomas#

So, confirmed fixed in intrepid and in jaunty. What are the stable release update regulations? If need be I can verify in hardy too. Does Rafael have a debdiff yet? Thanks !

Thomas

It's not fixed in intrepid or jaunty, as we don't have a debdiff yet.

It was working in Hardy.

Automatically got closed at around 23% in Intrepid. Reinstalled, working fine.

not fixed for me in Jaunty.. I'm using the release from sf.net now.. that works fine..

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ aptoncd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
FATAL -> Failed to fork.

I get the above error and I have monitored the memory usage during this process. It goes to a threshold of 97.2% (out of my 2 GB ram) and actually starts to increase the swap usage too. But on about 200 MB of swap the operations fails with the above error. aptoncd window get closed. So it seems like 2GB memory is also not enough these days :-D. Thinking of buying another 2G card ( just kidding ). See the screenshot.

the configuration of my system is,

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=9.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=jaunty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 9.04"

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ uname -a
Linux prageeth-laptop 2.6.28-11-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 8 04:38:53 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux

Same problem here with Jaunty.

No success with solution in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/aptoncd/+bug/272509/comments/27 ; see output:

sudo dpkg -i aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb
(Lendo banco de dados ... 161901 arquivos e diretórios atualmente instalados).
Preparando para substituir aptoncd 0.1.98-0ubuntu4 (usando aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
Desempacotando substituto aptoncd ...
dpkg: problemas de dependência impedem a configuração de aptoncd:
 aptoncd depende de python (<< 2.6); porém:
  Versão de python no sistema é 2.6.2-0ubuntu1.
dpkg: erro processando aptoncd (--install):
 problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado
Processando gatilhos para man-db ...
Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de:
 aptoncd

AND I'm having a very high use of resources, as you can see in screenshot attached.

This bug is still exisiting in Jaunty. This is an important app and therefore I am surprised how Jaunty was shipped with this bug. The same problem happened during Hardy and it took nearly a month to fix.

I confirm that this bug is still present in Jaunty.

If got the same issue as João Santana in jaunty in virtualbox.
python2.5 is installed.

The fix and the debdiff is on the way. We lost our package mantainer, that
was the cause of the delay.

2009/4/26 michote <email address hidden>

> If got the same issue as João Santana in jaunty in virtualbox.
> python2.5 is installed.
>
> --
> APTonCD crashes
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272509
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laudeci Oliveira
Official Ubuntu Member
Red Hat Certified Technician
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Tecnólogo em Sistema de Informação

Confirm on Jaunty.
Older version requires "Python << 2.6".

What I can do to install on Ubuntu 9.04?

By when can we expect the bugfix ? Pls advise

It is definitely not working when no of packages reach about 150, I have about 380 download packages and if i add them all together it just crashes, by adding packages in the form of group of 20 one time i could add up to 180 packages and then it crashes, so hope a bug fix will be available soon.

"Best of luck Developers"

My distribution is ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty and it happens like what i described above.

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb

Please, try the file in the above link, we are trying to provide a debdiff to reflect the new version with that fix.

This file is the same one I got on october 2008.

$ date
Sat May 30 13:40:23 VLAST 2009

$ wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb -c
--2009-05-30 13:44:20-- http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb
got address launchpadlibrarian.net... 91.189.90.235
length: 101974 (100K) [application/x-debian-package]
saved as: `aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb'.

100%[=================================================================================>] 101 974 14,3K/s в 7,0s

2009-05-30 13:44:28 (14,3 KB/s) - `aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb' saved [101974/101974]

$ gdebi aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb
Reading package lists: Done
Reading state information: Done
Reading state information: Done
Reading state information: Done
Reading state information: Done
Этот пакет невозможно установить (russ: package can npot be installed)
Зависимость не может быть удовлетворена: python (<< 2.6) (russ: dependence can't be satisfied)

$ ls apt* -l
-rw-r--r-- 1 sergei sergei 101974 2008-10-13 12:35 aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.de
-rw-r--r-- 1 sergei sergei 101974 2008-10-13 13:35 aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb

$ cmp aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.de -b -l
$

I went back to intrepid ( ubuntu 8.10 ). It also crashed like the same in intrepid.

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ uname -a
Linux prageeth-laptop 2.6.27-14-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 18:59:16 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ cat /proc/meminfo | grep Total
MemTotal: 2064360 kB
HighTotal: 1171072 kB
LowTotal: 893288 kB
SwapTotal: 2104472 kB
VmallocTotal: 110584 kB
HugePages_Total: 0

prageeth@prageeth-laptop:~$ aptoncd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
FATAL -> Failed to fork.

Then i installed this one.
[http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb]

Hurray. It works. It does not use a high memory like the package coming from the apt line.

But I did not try this on jaunty yet.

Good news to all, this bug is I think now solved, as I downloaded the latest aptoncd package from

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/aptoncd/aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb

and installed in my new jaunty 9.04 installation, it worked fine and i made a 550mb addon cd with it which really worked great.

So here is a short howto for this,

1- First I downloaded this package from sourceforge (aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb)
2- This package need a dependency nautilus-cd-burner,
   and its in jaunty repository also, you could also download it separately as
   all dependecies for it are full filled in the base installation of jaunty.
3- First you should install nautilus-cd-burner, it will ask for removal of
   Braseiro (Default cd burning software in jaunty installation)and a lib file
   for baseiro. It will be removed when nautilus-cd-burner will be installed.
4- Now install aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb and it will work fine with even large no.
   of packages.

I did it yesterday after reading all about this bug and now its really working fine.
Thanks to latest version of aptoncd.

May be it works, but requirement of nautilus-cd-burner removed the brasero, and I dislike that.

Hmm... after switching back to brasero and aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb creation of image for 200 megs of packages went just OK...

Its very simple that if nautilus-cd-burner remove 2 files and one like braseiro you could simply make any cd by installing latest aptoncd and than after making cd you could again revert to your original condition by installing brasiero. any how nautilus-cd-burner is also working great for me, but no doubt braseiro is the interface i like more too.

aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb could easily make 200 mb cd, but problem is when you increase the no of packages and your size increase from 300mb, If you could please check that and send here the result it will be helpful.

:-( It "failed to fork" on 980 meg cache. :-(

but I need brasero, so, waiting for another corrected version of AptOnCD...

So best of luck if you need braseiro :) As these are just two packages when i need to make a cd i use latest aptoncd and than uninstall it, as i don't need to do it 100 times in one day :) i needed it once in month or even longer time, so not much problem for me :)

But hope you will find it soon as in the way you want.

Good news to all, this bug is I think now solved, as I downloaded the latest aptoncd package from

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/aptoncd/aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb

and installed in my new jaunty 9.04 installation, it worked fine and i made a 550mb addon cd with it which really worked great.

So here is a short howto for this,

1- First I downloaded this package from sourceforge (aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb)
2- This package need a dependency nautilus-cd-burner,
   and its in jaunty repository also, you could also download it separately as
   all dependecies for it are full filled in the base installation of jaunty.
3- First you should install nautilus-cd-burner, it will ask for removal of
   Braseiro (Default cd burning software in jaunty installation)and a lib file
   for baseiro. It will be removed when nautilus-cd-burner will be installed.
4- Now install aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb and it will work fine with even large no.
   of packages.

I did it yesterday after reading all about this bug and now its really working fine.

I am new to Ubuntu by a few months. I have learned a lot but I am unclear. I have 9.04 and experience the same memory problem with AptOnCD. I downloaded the update listed above as having worked, the 1.98 all fix. When I doubleclick to install the debian package, it opens the synamptic package manager but "install" button is not available. When I run "sudo apt-get install packagewhatever" it says that it can not find the package even though it is in the directory that I am working with in terminal. Am I doing something wrong or missing something?

I too am new to ubuntu but have used few previous releases. Aptoncd package which resolved all my problems was found on sourcefoge at this link:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/aptoncd/aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb
its version is 1-1 not 1.98. The next thing which you are telling that when you click a package, the installer which open is gdebi, and install button will be available only if all dependencies and conflicts are satisfied. Finally apt-get install will work only if the required package is in the selected repositories for apt.

I guess my question is that most people seem to say that the 1.98_all listed above fixed their problem without dropping our burner and picking up nautilus burner. I downloaded the same file that was listed above and it will not install, so what am I doing wrong? I have read a little about the 1-1 version, but I do not want to drop my burner program for nautilus right now.

Please don't abuse the launchpad bug tracker as a support forum. Use Launchpad Answers or the ubuntuforums instead.

The reason why you can't install the 0.1.98 version is that it was built for python 2.5 and it conflicts with python 2.6. It is not an official release, but it is newer than the 0.1 version which you get from sourceforge.
Using the old version 0.1 is just a workaround.

Thanks for your understanding.

Thanks version from sourceforge aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb really work well on my desktop with ubuntu 9.04. Other version 0.1.98 is confirmed buggy.

Installing the aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb is useless because the package manager reports broken packages and the 'apt-get -f install' removes that version and 'autoupgrades' with the 0.1.98 (which is not working as 'crashes' with FATAL -> Failed to fork)

So we are waiting for the fixed 1.98 :) any how aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb works well and I made today a 1.4GB DVD with that. Surely apt-get -f will remove it if it have the other one in the package repository. But till we get the fix i find this one very useful.

waiting for a fast solution for the 1.98
i use jaunty , and at the moment i an using the 1-1 release but i like more braseiro...

ok i repost:
succesfully maded 474 packages with 501.2 MB total in APTonCD 0.1.98-0ubuntu4 on Jaunty . it scan fine my packages maded the iso file and burned it succefully. i used the installation that gives my repository not the version what is posted here , i hope that when increase the value of megabytes on cache files it dont goes crashes again,

does anyone knows about a stable and trustable solution anyway?

still need a solution , now i have 473 packages total 500.2 MB my aptoncd crashes on 96% scanning the packages

aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb works on Jaunty...

The problem with the latest version is it uses RAM and SWAP instead of HDD... aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb uses only like 150 MB of RAM...

When I run the program aptoncd and put it to "create" when you arrive at 80% it closes by itself, someone knows what can be?
  performed via terminal and appeared: FATAL -> Failed to fork

here is a patch to solve it

download the fix here http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18476205/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb

you must have installed python 2.5 or 2.6 from synaptic first , if you have the 2 of them much better

install the fix from the terminal with this command
sudo dpkg -i --force-all aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb

and ready ! the installation must give you some problems about dependencys but its no trouble, later of finish you are ready to use APTONCD

post here if it solve it for you

i use jaunty 9.04, sorry my bad english

Portuguese:
Eu ja tentei, esse comando. nerdhacker. Eu obtive isso de retorno.

English:
I already tried this command, nerdhacker. I got this in return.

sudo dpkg -i --force-all '/home/linux/Documentos/Download/aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb'
(Lendo banco de dados ... 145646 arquivos e diretórios atualmente instalados).
Preparando para substituir aptoncd 0.1.98-0ubuntu4 (usando .../aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb) ...
INFO: using unknown version '/usr/bin/python3.0' (debian_defaults not up-to-date?)
Desempacotando substituto aptoncd ...
dpkg: aptoncd: problemas de dependência, mas configurando assim mesmo como pedido:
 aptoncd depende de python (<< 2.6); porém:
  Versão de python no sistema é 2.6.2-0ubuntu1.
Configurando aptoncd (0.1.98-0ubuntu4) ...
INFO: using unknown version '/usr/bin/python3.0' (debian_defaults not up-to-date?)

Processando gatilhos para man-db ..

I had the same problem:

dpkg: aptoncd: problemas de dependência, mas configurando assim mesmo como pedido:
 aptoncd depende de python (<< 2.6); porém:
  Versão de python no sistema é 2.6.2-0ubuntu1.
Configurando aptoncd (0.1.98-0ubuntu4) ...

It installs, but he is as a broken package.

i use jaunty 9.04, sorry my bad english[2]

Thank you nerdhacker, same being a temporary solution, it helped me.

I had the same problem:

dpkg: aptoncd: problemas de dependência, mas configurando assim mesmo como pedido:
 aptoncd depende de python (<< 2.6); porém:
  Versão de python no sistema é 2.6.2-0ubuntu1.
Configurando aptoncd (0.1.98-0ubuntu4) ...

It (aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all) installs, but he is as a broken package. Then necessary to bring up to date it. Whenever necessary to use it, I have that to make everything of new.

i use jaunty 9.04, sorry my bad english[2]

For me, I don't have a problem with the package in the repos in a fresh jaunty. I do get this error if I choose to reload the package data after it has already scanned once. I do not have nautilus-cd-burner installed but do have brasero.

Although "aptoncd_0.1.98-0ubuntu4_all.deb" doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope.
I am trying to run aptoncd installed from ubuntu repo's and the problem still exists. AptonCD crashes at about 30-40% when collecting packages.
I also tried to install the deb package you gave the link here, but it cannot be installed because it asks for python2.6 although ubuntu 9.04 installs 2.6 version even when I type sudo apt-get install python2.5

Confirming:
aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb works on Jaunty...

It looks like the version made of aptoncd by the ubuntu team cannot handle sizes approximately 1GB and bigger. To solve this I had to remove basero and libasero and install aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb from the aptoncd website together with dependencies. It works like a charm and it also shows on gnome add/remove that aptoncd is installed. I just finished creating an aptoncd repos dvd of 3.8GB

For those with the python dependency problem, synaptic package manager can install python 2.5/2.6/3.0 so just use it to install python and you are good to go. Then install nautilus-cd-burner which would remove brasero and libbrasero-media0. sorry for the misspelling of brasero in the previous post

Same thing, APTonCD crashes in
- Ubuntu 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope - released in April 2009
- Gnome 2.26.1 - Build Date: 05/06/2009

Sorry, aptoncd_0.1-1_all.deb works successfully in Jaunty

I think most of us asking for bug fixing because ubuntu repository still uses 0.1.98. For that I'm asking you to send update notification to ubuntu community for updating APTonCD in ubuntu repositories.

This will be solved when bug #416262 will be closed.

Latest version of Aptoncd has just landed in Karmic, so I'll close this bug report.

Fabrice

What about Jaunty. Will this bugfix be released for Jaunty ? if so when ?

Same problem on my Jaunty. Thanks,Ed

that is a problem still in jaunty that is why i just install the original

--- On Mon, 5/10/09, S gopalakrishnan <email address hidden> wrote:

From: S gopalakrishnan <email address hidden>
Subject: [Bug 272509] Re: APTonCD crashes
To: <email address hidden>
Date: Monday, 5 October, 2009, 12:55 AM

What about  Jaunty.    Will this  bugfix be released for Jaunty ?  if so
when ?

--
APTonCD crashes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272509
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

I was trying to get a repo working for upgrade to Karmic, and aptoncd crashes in Jaunty.

I am not able to install attached application. I don't know why "install package" is not showing up. I am not able to install deb file mentioned in the post-

"Hi,

Could you guys, that were experiencing the problem, install the attached package and see if the problem still persists?

Every feedback is very welcome.

Thanks for your time.
Regards."

I have downloaded iso file I would try it. DO I need to uninstall my earlier version of aptoncd?

Thanks

The short answer is no. :D
You can use the version you have to restore your iso file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laudeci Oliveira
Official Ubuntu Member
Red Hat Certified Technician
Tecnólogo em Sistema de Informação

2009/11/4 directsaurabh <email address hidden>

> I am not able to install attached application. I don't know why "install
> package" is not showing up. I am not able to install deb file mentioned
> in the post-
>
> "Hi,
>
> Could you guys, that were experiencing the problem, install the attached
> package and see if the problem still persists?
>
> Every feedback is very welcome.
>
> Thanks for your time.
> Regards."
>
> I have downloaded iso file I would try it. DO I need to uninstall my
> earlier version of aptoncd?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> APTonCD crashes
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272509
> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>