Comment 29 for bug 204133

Revision history for this message
Agostino Russo (ago) wrote :

Colin,

A couple of things I wanted to mention.

1) In the CD lupin-sysctl is not installed, so in the first reboot the sysctl hacks are simply not used. The sysvinit scripts are identical.

2) In my case I had to reboot several times in order to get a situation where I could access the logs, and in a few cases I had more severe locks and had to use alt+sysrq+r+s+u+b (possibly also hard reboot) and all that was in vm which has been mistreated in the past. All this to say that fs corruption might have already been there to begin with and may or may not be a casue of the locks.

So to summarize it seems that sysctl setting do have an important role in addressing the original poster error. It is uncertain whether such sysctl settings do actually help in preventing fs corruption (in hard reboot scenarios and in normal reboot scenarios). It is uncertain whether fs corruption is a possible outcome of a normal reboot, but from your tests it seems not (was that with or without sysctl hacks?).