Comment 21 for bug 94065

Revision history for this message
Scott James Remnant (scott) wrote : Re: [Bug 94065] Re: init: add non-destructive means to disable a job

Because, believe it or not, it's not a very common use case - in the
Debian and Ubuntu world, you're generally expected to uninstall
services you don't need.

Also the Dpkg package manager *honours* deletes as a conffile change,
so if you simply delete the job (or change its extension) it won't
come back after an upgrade.

But as I said in my last comment, there is now an easy way to mark a
job as manual - and in the next release, this won't even require
editing the .conf file

Scott

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:32 AM, MestreLion <email address hidden> wrote:
> "slightly embarassinng"? Youre being very kind...
>
> Its a complete shame for Upstart not to have ANY means to disable
> services at startup.
>
> More incredibly is that Ubuntu (and even Debian) is now migrating to it.
>
> So now we are back to the old days of manually editing scripts? Hows
> that ANY improvement? Not everyday a tool achieves being bad for both
> desktop end users AND server sysadmins...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Upstart
> Developers, which is subscribed to upstart .
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94065
>
> Title:
>  init: add non-destructive means to disable a job
>
> Status in Upstart:
>  Triaged
> Status in “upstart” package in Ubuntu:
>  Invalid
>
> Bug description:
>  I need the ability to disable an event.d entry without removing the entry completely.  this is the equivalent of commenting a line in /etc/inittab.  this might be to temporarily disable a serial line getty, or whatever.
>
>
>