© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
@Axel Napolitano
I think this plea from you is the most succinct summary we've seen of the attitude problem:
"I hope that canonical can be a bit less dogmatic and a bit more pragmatic."
A quick update: Issac Joseph has created a project called "Unity Revamped" which seems to address some of these pragmatic concerns (though it doesn't incorporate the movable-Launcher patch):
https:/
https:/
As I mentioned before, forks of Unity are not great solutions: the burden is on the dev to keep merging in the mainline code and testing it thoroughly before each release. I find it unfeasible in the long run, unless the Unity team itself incorporates these enhanced versions into their main dev/test process. Mark's comment about celebrating forks is thus a bit glib -- and non-pragammatic.