...
>
> One more strange detail: james_w ran a script to delete all the branches
> of these affected imports, and yet http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
> branches/debian/squeeze/dsdo/squeeze/.bzr/repository/packs/ and
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
> branches/debian/sid/dsdo/sid/.bzr/repository/packs/ show timestamps
> almost 12 months old for the pack files! I guess the deletion failed?
>
Or he deleted the branch but not the repository? Or some of the packs
aren't referenced in pack-names, or...?
The differing content for the same revision-id is, indeed, pretty
worrying. The importer doesn't use deterministic revision ids, so I
really don't know how that could have happened.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
... bazaar. launchpad. net/~ubuntu- debian/ squeeze/ dsdo/squeeze/ .bzr/repository /packs/ and bazaar. launchpad. net/~ubuntu- debian/ sid/dsdo/ sid/.bzr/ repository/ packs/ show timestamps
>
> One more strange detail: james_w ran a script to delete all the branches
> of these affected imports, and yet http://
> branches/
> http://
> branches/
> almost 12 months old for the pack files! I guess the deletion failed?
>
Or he deleted the branch but not the repository? Or some of the packs
aren't referenced in pack-names, or...?
The differing content for the same revision-id is, indeed, pretty
worrying. The importer doesn't use deterministic revision ids, so I
really don't know how that could have happened.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk1 MF8wACgkQJdeBCY SNAANAjACfUz3sb clASWYFJpwNOK4n Alcy 8d96e02pYUsnFmF FDS8
fpMAn0vTkEq8/
=7EXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----