Comment 44 for bug 375345

It seems to me that there's some confusion as to what the actual problem is because we're actually dealing with two separate issues. The first issue is whether or not Canonical should be using the Ubuntu name on a product which they plan to charge money for. The second is whether or not they should be using that name on a product which is not open-source. Regardless of how you feel about these two issues (personally, I've got no problem with the first, but major reservations about the second), discussing them as if they are one and the same is causing a lot of unnecessary confusion and antagonism.