Comment 81 for bug 387308

... so Papukaija's pointed to a link that provides a guideline on how to
judge whether a problem is worthy of being addressed. Of course these kind
of guidelines serve a purpose, however in this case it seems a narrow
definition is being used as a reason for preventing a potentially
significant improvement from getting addressed. Can't we look at the big
picture here? Contrast Ubuntu One with Dropbox - would Dropbox's consider it
"unimportant" if a significant contingent of it's customer base couldn't
access it's services? I doubt it!