Comment 24 for bug 541492
Revision history for this message
| Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote Re: MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) | #24 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
One consideration to take into account, is if we move to UMS for i845, it means we will be entirely unable to get further upstream support on this chip, since any new patches they generate are going to be only for KMS cases. However 8xx has typically not received a high level of support priority upstream anyway, so i845 may be better off in UMS anyway. I have hopes we'll see things better squared away for i8xx KMS in Meerkat, but we'll see...