On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:13:13AM -0000, Sander Jonkers wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alexey Balmashnov
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Can anyone else confirm, as stated in the bug description, that the problem
> > > appeared between 2.6.27-1 and 2.6.27-2?
> >
> > I don't remember that I ever used 2.6.27-1 kernel. Is there a simple way
> > to install it? I think that many people started to test 8.10 later, than
> > the kernel was introduced (e.g. from beta release), and having such an
> > instruction in the comments would result in broader testing (I will
> > definitely try).
>
> It seems linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic has existed, as Google reports:
>
> Ubuntu -- Details voor pakket linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic in
> intrepid
>
> Linux kernel image for version 2.6.27 on x86/x86_64.
> packages.ubuntu.com/nl/intrepid/main/linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic - 14k -
>
> However, http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic
> does not exist (anymore), whereas
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic does
> exist.
>
> So: where's linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:13:13AM -0000, Sander Jonkers wrote: 2.6.27- 1-generic has existed, as Google reports: 2.6.27- 1-generic in ubuntu. com/nl/ intrepid/ main/linux- image-2. 6.27-1- generic - 14k - packages. ubuntu. com/intrepid/ linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic packages. ubuntu. com/intrepid/ linux-image- 2.6.27- 7-generic does 2.6.27- 1-generic?
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alexey Balmashnov
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Can anyone else confirm, as stated in the bug description, that the problem
> > > appeared between 2.6.27-1 and 2.6.27-2?
> >
> > I don't remember that I ever used 2.6.27-1 kernel. Is there a simple way
> > to install it? I think that many people started to test 8.10 later, than
> > the kernel was introduced (e.g. from beta release), and having such an
> > instruction in the comments would result in broader testing (I will
> > definitely try).
>
> It seems linux-image-
>
> Ubuntu -- Details voor pakket linux-image-
> intrepid
>
> Linux kernel image for version 2.6.27 on x86/x86_64.
> packages.
>
> However, http://
> does not exist (anymore), whereas
> http://
> exist.
>
> So: where's linux-image-
You can find old versions of the Ubuntu kernel at: /edge.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux
https:/
Click on a version: /edge.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/2. 6.27-1. 2
https:/
Click on a build for the right architecture (say i386): /edge.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/2. 6.27-1. 2/+build/ 699407
https:/
Then find the linux-image- xxx-generic package: /edge.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ intrepid/ i386/linux- image-2. 6.27-1- generic/ 2.6.27- 1.2
https:/
and click the link to download the .deb: launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 17040869/ linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic_ 2.6.27- 1.2_i386. deb
http://
It would help if someone could narrow down the regression to a specific
version by thoroughly testing each one.
--
- mdz