On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alexey Balmashnov
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Can anyone else confirm, as stated in the bug description, that the problem
> > appeared between 2.6.27-1 and 2.6.27-2?
>
> I don't remember that I ever used 2.6.27-1 kernel. Is there a simple way
> to install it? I think that many people started to test 8.10 later, than
> the kernel was introduced (e.g. from beta release), and having such an
> instruction in the comments would result in broader testing (I will
> definitely try).
It seems linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic has existed, as Google reports:
Ubuntu -- Details voor pakket linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic in intrepid
Linux kernel image for version 2.6.27 on x86/x86_64.
packages.ubuntu.com/nl/intrepid/main/linux-image-2.6.27-1-generic - 14k -
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Alexey Balmashnov
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Can anyone else confirm, as stated in the bug description, that the problem
> > appeared between 2.6.27-1 and 2.6.27-2?
>
> I don't remember that I ever used 2.6.27-1 kernel. Is there a simple way
> to install it? I think that many people started to test 8.10 later, than
> the kernel was introduced (e.g. from beta release), and having such an
> instruction in the comments would result in broader testing (I will
> definitely try).
It seems linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic has existed, as Google reports:
Ubuntu -- Details voor pakket linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic in intrepid
Linux kernel image for version 2.6.27 on x86/x86_64. ubuntu. com/nl/ intrepid/ main/linux- image-2. 6.27-1- generic - 14k -
packages.
However, http:// packages. ubuntu. com/intrepid/ linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic packages. ubuntu. com/intrepid/ linux-image- 2.6.27- 7-generic does
does not exist (anymore), whereas
http://
exist.
So: where's linux-image- 2.6.27- 1-generic?