(In reply to comment #44)
> I would personally prefer to understand the 192 broken-ness before landing it
> anywhere.
I certainly agree! The brokenness is probably still there in mozilla-central, but just not exercised. It might be fine, but until we understand what's happening, I don't trust it.
(In reply to comment #44)
> I would personally prefer to understand the 192 broken-ness before landing it
> anywhere.
I certainly agree! The brokenness is probably still there in mozilla-central, but just not exercised. It might be fine, but until we understand what's happening, I don't trust it.