Comment 38 for bug 269509

> Perhaps it should exclude "Software Renderer" in its checking?

That's exactly what it does now.

So if the bug was solely about "compiz fails on second session", we could close this. However, it says "second X server pretends to be DRI capable", which mesa is clearly not. I don't mind if the -intel task gets closed as invalid, or whether you want to keep it around for the fact that -intel currently just supports one DRI capable head (this is an issue with e. g. having the gdm session and the user's session both use composite, which isn't possible with the current intel driver).