Comment 19 for bug 246836

Revision history for this message
Ab3L (himura-kenshin) wrote : Re: this is interesting

Hey!

Please read the article I've just found, I think it is really interesting. Here, take a look http://frills.mediandesign.com

Warmest regards, Kenshin Himura

From: Bug 246836 [mailto:<email address hidden>]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 12:23 PM
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Ooh, a picky eater.

"He knew the 'homo' part of the word could be politically charged, but he thought the explanation of that quirky part of the English language would be educational.

Nomen has removed that blog from its website"

...So now he just talks about "[]phones?" I take it?

Also, "'People at this level of English,' Woodger says, 'may see the "homo" side and think it has something to do with gay sex.'" Look, I think about gay sex a *LOT*, but it doesn't come to mind every time I see the letters H-O-M-O. That's fucking gay. This dude must be thinking about cock **constantly**.

And in any case: WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCKING FUCK. Even if they were speaking graphically about anal sex between men, who the fuck cares? Jesus Christ, it's fucking 2015. Quit being fucking puritan fucking psychos from the 1600s. Fuck.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10