Comment 69 for bug 323041
Revision history for this message
|
|
#69 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Quite frankly, I don't understand the need to have "year added" there
anyway. If it's for copyright assignment the year may be necessary (?), but
is it's really that important when a layout was added. This information is
avialable through the RCS anyway.
> Crimean Tatar (Crimean Turkish) layouts (2009-01-30).
> Crimean Tatar (Crimean Turkish) layouts. Added: 2009-01-30.
If we add a date, I'd vote for the second one. Sergey, any opinions?
> Where 2009-01-30 could be replaced w/ 2009-02-24: the date this was first
> released by Ubuntu.
It should be the commit date to upstream to avoid confusion. Otherwise you'd
have a reference to a date when it wasn't yet available in this repo and
then you have to start hunting down info downstream which is always a pain.