Comment 16 for bug 323041
Revision history for this message
|
|
#16 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Why am i not surprised. A question posted, and revert is made 6 minutes later. You had no grounds to revert everything!
I have a sneaky suspicion that you are just trying to make it difficult, after all the time i've spent to finally get this checked in.
Anyway, i'm not sure if it will help, but here are the answers to your questions.
1)
> Resat, you've added crh variants to 6(!) countries. Why? Could you please explain? I guess it is only needed in symbols/ua - I'd appreciate if you remove it from other countries.
Answer:
Because due to expulsions from native lands, performed by the way by the country that you represent, the nation is dispersed with proportionally large communities (and even w/ some alphabet variations) in at least 4 countries: tr, ua, uz, ro. These 4 are not up to discussion, based on even the most pessimistic estimates. Poland and Bulgaria might be discussed, but i decided to check them under those countries too, because communities are present there as well: and there's even a film about the community in Poland. If you were going to revert anything, you could somewhat plausibly revert the layouts under those 2 countries, at least for the time being.
2)
> Also, the description in base.xml.in should match the group name in symbols file.
Answer:
That could've been updated. That is no reason to revert anything.
3)
> Actually, you also committed .po file which should only be added from Translation Project.
Answer:
That is not a reason to revert, and even if it was, it would only warrant reverting the 1 .po file. TP arrangement can be made in time for the next release, but i do not see why a file that has already been provided couldn't stay checked in.
------
To wrap up, you could've possibly reverted, after discussion, pl, bg, and .po file, but not everything! I specifically notified you of this check-in, in case something was really flawed. I think reverting like that w/o any grounds for it, and w/o any discussion is an abuse. This is an open source project for the entire open source community, and not your personal one.