Comment 32 for bug 1013881

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

@Emmanual: the reason we rolled back rather than include that nl->n 1 liner change is that we want to see the other fixes out and it's still not clear that the change is the correct one and wouldn't create issues and lead to another SRU verification fail.

Do you know the drawbacks we would have exactly with doing that change? It was mentioned upstream that it would make easier to insert nbsp chars by mistake, would you consider that a regression?