Ubuntu
wget package

  1. Bug #1861440
  2. Comment #8

Comment 8 for bug 1861440

Revision history for this message
In , fperalta (fperalta-redhat-bugs) wrote :

Thank you Tomás,
 Yes, I think the most important thing now is to make sure the behaviour of no_proxy is again consistent with previous versions.
 Then discussions about what is the standard to use and agree on it can be taken and if then eventually those will be different, it will be announced in release notes in advance and proper way.

Kind Regards,
 Cisco.