Comment 19 for bug 247669

Revision history for this message
In , Tom (tom-redhat-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to comment #7)
> Thank you for your report. I think best should be rebase RHEL5 Xvnc to F7 vnc
> (bug #385241) because it is more stable. I'm going to try put attached patch to
> next vnc update.

I'm sure it's probably true that the better option is to rebase, however, you
also state in that bug that this is not likely to happen before RHEL5U3. From a
user perspective that's likely to be a year away and potentially longer (U1 took
9 months).

I would hope that a bugfix can get in faster as the vnc.so module as currently
shipped is basically unusable. It's unrealistic to expect customers to wait for
two years for a working VNC, especially when it worked fine with previous
releases of RHEL.