I'm eager to get booting under 2.6.31, can you explain exactly what needs to
be edited in order for me to squash this bug.
Best,
ashzilla
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, knarf <email address hidden>wrote:
> PS Scott #20, why would there be any danger of hosing the system by
> fixing a bug? Those {unique} parameters currently cause problems, they
> are a new addition to the rules file, it works fine without (just check
> the file used in Debian for an example). If and when udev starts
> supporting them they can be put back in the config file. For now they
> should not be there as they cause problems.
>
> --
> udev 147 outputs warnings about default rules
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430654
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
knarf,
I'm eager to get booting under 2.6.31, can you explain exactly what needs to
be edited in order for me to squash this bug.
Best,
ashzilla
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, knarf <email address hidden>wrote:
> PS Scott #20, why would there be any danger of hosing the system by /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 430654
> fixing a bug? Those {unique} parameters currently cause problems, they
> are a new addition to the rules file, it works fine without (just check
> the file used in Debian for an example). If and when udev starts
> supporting them they can be put back in the config file. For now they
> should not be there as they cause problems.
>
> --
> udev 147 outputs warnings about default rules
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>