in [1] you reverted a previous commit [2] to fix the Huawei E1550 GSM
modem in udev (using modem-modeswitch) with the rationale that "other
manufacturers have completely different methods for killing their fake
driver CD". However, the rule was tested on that actual hardware, and
it worked fine.
I'm interested in why this rule was bad, and what should be done
instead?
Hey Dan,
in [1] you reverted a previous commit [2] to fix the Huawei E1550 GSM
modem in udev (using modem-modeswitch) with the rationale that "other
manufacturers have completely different methods for killing their fake
driver CD". However, the rule was tested on that actual hardware, and
it worked fine.
I'm interested in why this rule was bad, and what should be done
instead?
Thanks,
Martin
[1] http:// git.kernel. org/?p= linux/hotplug/ udev.git; a=commitdiff; h=8a993fab2f218 234f06743bcc127 dda61a45711b git.kernel. org/?p= linux/hotplug/ udev.git; a=commit; h=53842b53820a0 f0b2b0ff5b28caf 01e3f7e26f22 www.piware. de
[2] http://
--
Martin Pitt | http://
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)