> Jackflap wrote:
> > Thanks for the fix Michael.
> >
> > Mat, I don't see how this isn't a papercut, the definition is clear:
> >
> > "A bug that will improve user experience if fixed, is small enough for
> > users to become habituated to it, and is trivial to fix."
> >
> > This bug clearly fits all 3 aspects of the definition.
> >
> >
> Not sure which definition you're referring to, please find the
> guidelines here:
>
> https://launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts
>
> We would love to fix all these usability bugs within all the apps, but
> for this project we'd like to concentrate on a system-wide bugs, rather
> than those specific to certain apps–there's simply too many of them!
>
> Thanks,
> M.
>
I suppose it's a good thing, but I can't think of any papercuts which are
'system-wide' rather than 'app-specific', so I'm hoping one day in the
future the project will have resources to address some app-specific ones as
well.
2009/6/12 Mat Tomaszewski <email address hidden>
> Jackflap wrote: /launchpad. net/hundredpape rcuts
> > Thanks for the fix Michael.
> >
> > Mat, I don't see how this isn't a papercut, the definition is clear:
> >
> > "A bug that will improve user experience if fixed, is small enough for
> > users to become habituated to it, and is trivial to fix."
> >
> > This bug clearly fits all 3 aspects of the definition.
> >
> >
> Not sure which definition you're referring to, please find the
> guidelines here:
>
> https:/
>
> We would love to fix all these usability bugs within all the apps, but
> for this project we'd like to concentrate on a system-wide bugs, rather
> than those specific to certain apps–there's simply too many of them!
>
> Thanks,
> M.
>
http:// blog.davebsd. com/2009/ 06/10/one- hundred- paper-cuts/
I suppose it's a good thing, but I can't think of any papercuts which are
'system-wide' rather than 'app-specific', so I'm hoping one day in the
future the project will have resources to address some app-specific ones as
well.
Alex