I suspect, but have yet to test, that the extra <CR> defect was introduced in revision 116 of the upstream code:
http://thinkfinger.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/thinkfinger/pam/pam_thinkfinger.c?r1=115&r2=116
With Jon's fix in place, I suspect that we can revert that change.
I suspect, but have yet to test, that the extra <CR> defect was introduced in revision 116 of the upstream code:
http:// thinkfinger. svn.sourceforge .net/viewvc/ thinkfinger/ pam/pam_ thinkfinger. c?r1=115& r2=116
With Jon's fix in place, I suspect that we can revert that change.