> #18
> Instead of changing this patch can you finish the adoption for simpledrm?
> This will get a DRM framebuffer up and running instantly. It should help a lot.
Yes! I've been thinking the same. We already have bug 1965303 to track that.
> #19
> Presumably the fsck stuff is coming from systemd-fsck@.service, right?
Yes I do need to double-check if hacking out PLY_ENABLE_SYSTEMD_INTEGRATION affects the presence of those specific messages. When I said doing so didn't help in comment #18 I may have been looking at *all* messages.
> #18
> Instead of changing this patch can you finish the adoption for simpledrm?
> This will get a DRM framebuffer up and running instantly. It should help a lot.
Yes! I've been thinking the same. We already have bug 1965303 to track that.
> #19 fsck@.service, right?
> Presumably the fsck stuff is coming from systemd-
Yes I do need to double-check if hacking out PLY_ENABLE_ SYSTEMD_ INTEGRATION affects the presence of those specific messages. When I said doing so didn't help in comment #18 I may have been looking at *all* messages.