Comment 73 for bug 303609

Yes, I indeed realize completely that there will always be a bug here
and there. That is even prevalent in my field of study. Now I don't
contribute as much as I should to the open source community as far as
software. But I do advertise and spread the word of Linux, and I do
defend Linux in every aspect. Almost to the point of it being a
religion. Now I am sorry about my being rude at speech before. Now I
would love to see pre-releases that have already been beta tested by
developers. I am sure there are plenty of people who would, but I do
realize that would be difficult. There may still be bugs even if done
this way, but I can at least state that the prevalence of bugs might
be lower. I can say this with certainty. I am not a proprietary type
person, however there is times where making money is needed. In my
field, you need to make money in order to keep at it. But lets just
resolve this. Pretend this all never happened.

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:36 PM, tristan8276 <email address hidden> wrote:
> @ibmloveslinux
>
> So, basically you're saying that it is inconvenient when bugs like this
> arise.  You would like it to be ironed out pre-release, in a beta
> testing environment.  The problem is that no matter how much you beta
> test, there will always be problems that arise in the field.  You say
> you are an electrical engineer, but that you haven't contributed much to
> the Open Source Community.  That is unfortunate, because you may have a
> lot to offer.
>
> My point is that there will always be bugs, and we should all be
> grateful that this forum of submitting, monitoring and working on bugs
> submitted from the community exists.
>
> My issue with you was your choice of language.  If you like Closed
> Source better, then by all means buy a mac or windows pc.  I hear
> Windows 7 may even be a good distro for a change.
>
> The point of bugsquad and this forum in general is for finding
> constructive ways to fix bugs.  Foul language will NOT be permitted.
>
> Also, I've installed and uninstalled java6 several times on my Lucid
> machine several times, with no problems.
>
> --
> declining the license during installation causes an error
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303609
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
> Status in Sun Java SE Development Kit: Invalid
> Status in “sun-java6” package in Ubuntu: Invalid
>
> Bug description:
> I was installing sun java 6 runtime via add/remove programs, and here's the result. i got broken package at sun-java6-jre.
>
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: i386
> Dependencies:
>
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
> ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
> NonfreeKernelModules: wl fglrx
> Package: sun-java6-jre None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-jre.list]
> PackageArchitecture: all
> SourcePackage: sun-java6
> Title: package sun-java6-jre None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-jre.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Uname: Linux 2.6.27-10-generic i686
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/sun-java/+bug/303609/+subscribe
>