Comment 6 for bug 581207

Hello again,

Dear Olivier Tilloy, thank you for spotting that I have missed the lower
function. I was just after the bug I observed, and for some reason
didn't think about the lower function. You are right, the same problem
exists with the lower function as well.

I am attaching a patch which includes an ascii_lower function in
addition to the ascii_upper function, and replaces all instances of
the lower and upper functions with their ascii_ prefixed counterparts.
(I also tried to use the formatting Olivier Tilloy preferred.)

Dear Olivier Tilloy and Michael Vogt, I would really appreciate it if you
could import the changes introduced by this improved patch into the
source code repository as well.

Regards,

M. Vefa Bicakci