Excuse the maybe ignorant question, but why is it assumed to be "just the way it is" if a package chokes on its own config data after an update? Certainly it should be expected to handle such a conflict in some graceful way?
Excuse the maybe ignorant question, but why is it assumed to be "just the way it is" if a package chokes on its own config data after an update? Certainly it should be expected to handle such a conflict in some graceful way?