Comment 17 for bug 620384

Revision history for this message
Stefano Rivera (stefanor) wrote : Re: New upstream release 0.11.1

Hi, sorry I haven't had much time available for Ubuntu in the last couple of weeks (pyweek got me)

In general, when you want to get the attention of sponsors again, you should resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors. However, given the size of the sponsor queue when I looked at it this weekend, I don't think there's been much universe sponsorship while I was away.

This package looks much better, thanks. I only have a few issues with it (from a quick skim):
1. The changelog in the proposed version rewrites history. Please base your changelog on the current version in maverick. BTW the format used with "LP #XXXX. $message" won't result in automatically closing bugs. You need to do "LP: #XXXX"
2. The package conflicts on packages not available in Ubuntu (nssbackup)
3. The maintainer scripts should allow invoke-rc.d and service to fail (adding "|| true" at the end of the command is a common solution).
4. sbackup-gtk needs to depend on libgtk2.0-bin because it calls gtk-update-icon-cache in postinst (or it needs to allow those calls to fail)