Comment 8 for bug 1448911

On 2015-04-29 01:07:19, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 05:06:57 PM you wrote:
> > On 2015-04-28 00:16:15, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 27, 2015 10:14:47 PM you wrote:
> > > > Hi Jonathan (and Scott) - This update fixes a security issue so it
> > > > should go through the -security sponsoring process rather than the SRU
> > > > process. The Security Team will get it sponsored to the security pocket
> > >
> > > > once these steps are followed:
> > > I know for security it's supposed to be built against security and not
> > > proposed/updates, but this close to release it's essentially the same
> > > thing. Can you just pocket copy this to security?
> >
> > We can do that in this case but it definitely isn't something that we
> > should make a habit of.
> >
> > Just to be clear, do you want us to copy it from -proposed to -security
> > now or wait until the SRU process completes and copy it from -updates to
> > -security at that time?
>
> Your call on when. It's the upstream fix, so I'm confident it's correct, but we
> can get someone to do verification first if you prefer.

Verification is always a good thing. We can wait for that. Thanks!