I compiled from source a while back so I'm clear now on both Hardy
and Intrepid. However, Hardy being LTS should really receive an
update.
We should rather ask that the version in Jaunty be backported.
Cheers!
--
Philippe
------
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
<Anonymous>
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:48:21 Martin Mai wrote:
> This was fixed upstream in version 0.9.1+svn20080822-1 and Jaunty
> is already shipping 0.9.1+svn20081112-1ubuntu1 so marking this as
> "fix released".
>
> ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Fix Released
I compiled from source a while back so I'm clear now on both Hardy
and Intrepid. However, Hardy being LTS should really receive an
update.
We should rather ask that the version in Jaunty be backported.
Cheers!
--
Philippe
------
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
<Anonymous>
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:48:21 Martin Mai wrote: 12-1ubuntu1 so marking this as
> This was fixed upstream in version 0.9.1+svn20080822-1 and Jaunty
> is already shipping 0.9.1+svn200811
> "fix released".
>
> ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Fix Released