Looks mostly good, except I noticed an oddity with the licensing. All the files that are (I presume) LGPL-2.1+ have the header:
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
That is, they describe themselves as being GPL-2.1+ (a license that doesn't exist).
debian/copyright is also ever-so-slightly off, as it says the library is LGPL-2+ (instead of LGPL-2.1+) though it does point the reader to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1.
Also, can you talk a bit about how Debian #527220 got fixed? I see a conflict/replace for pacemaker-heartbeat but not one for heartbeat itself, which I would expect.
Looks mostly good, except I noticed an oddity with the licensing. All the files that are (I presume) LGPL-2.1+ have the header:
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
That is, they describe themselves as being GPL-2.1+ (a license that doesn't exist).
debian/copyright is also ever-so-slightly off, as it says the library is LGPL-2+ (instead of LGPL-2.1+) though it does point the reader to /usr/share/ common- licenses/ LGPL-2. 1.
Also, can you talk a bit about how Debian #527220 got fixed? I see a conflict/replace for pacemaker-heartbeat but not one for heartbeat itself, which I would expect.