Comment 5 for bug 527195

Revision history for this message
Michael Terry (mterry) wrote :

Looks mostly good, except I noticed an oddity with the licensing. All the files that are (I presume) LGPL-2.1+ have the header:

 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

That is, they describe themselves as being GPL-2.1+ (a license that doesn't exist).

debian/copyright is also ever-so-slightly off, as it says the library is LGPL-2+ (instead of LGPL-2.1+) though it does point the reader to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1.

Also, can you talk a bit about how Debian #527220 got fixed? I see a conflict/replace for pacemaker-heartbeat but not one for heartbeat itself, which I would expect.