Comment 15 for bug 194919

Ok, I've taken a look at the package now.

I'm inclined to reject this bug for the following reasons: Modifying openal to depend on the openal library package or openal-soft is a gross hack which contradicts everything library packages should adhere to. The only way to make packages use of the openal-soft library is hence to rebuild these against it. And I'm not really in favour of doing this that late in the cycle. However only having the new library in hardy, with no package using it seems not to provide anything useful to me.