On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Arnaud Quette <email address hidden> wrote:
> ok, so let's go that way. *but* you (the server team) will have less PDUs to
> announce (only the SNMP ones present in NUT).
> the thing I'm not sure about: removing only the Build-dep should not be
> sufficient since the debhelper files for powerman are still there! or did I
> got you wrong?
You're absolutely right.... The build did *not* succeed. Sorry.
> I will need the 2.4.1-2 source pkg you've uploaded (which removes the
> build-dep *and* the debhelper files) before I can do the debdiff...
Forget the package I uploaded... It's bust. Just hit me with a
debdiff against Debian (like your other one), but drop the build-dep
(and whatever else that entails) against powerman. This will allow
for some testing of nut, while the MIR gets processed.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Arnaud Quette <email address hidden> wrote:
> ok, so let's go that way. *but* you (the server team) will have less PDUs to
> announce (only the SNMP ones present in NUT).
> the thing I'm not sure about: removing only the Build-dep should not be
> sufficient since the debhelper files for powerman are still there! or did I
> got you wrong?
You're absolutely right.... The build did *not* succeed. Sorry.
> I will need the 2.4.1-2 source pkg you've uploaded (which removes the
> build-dep *and* the debhelper files) before I can do the debdiff...
Forget the package I uploaded... It's bust. Just hit me with a
debdiff against Debian (like your other one), but drop the build-dep
(and whatever else that entails) against powerman. This will allow
for some testing of nut, while the MIR gets processed.
> done: https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/MainInclusi onReportPowerma n /launchpad. net/bugs/ 337226
> done: https:/
Great! I'll try to nurse those along.
:-Dustin