Comment 61 for bug 501393

Revision history for this message
In , Dao (dao) wrote :

(In reply to comment #57)
> > The current patch should at least not add actions when the server doesn't
> > announce "actions" capability. That would also be in line with comment 25.
>
> I'd rather do this than fallback to XUL, this bug seems like a giant waste if
> the most popular distribution doesn't benefit from it in any way.

I'm not sure that I agree with comment 25 there, or maybe I misunderstand it. If the caller wants a callback (which might even be reflected in the notification message) and the server tells us that it doesn't support it, falling back to XUL is the only sane solution, IMHO. I think this needs to be evangelized on the Ubuntu side.