On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 20:34 +0000, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Alright I've pushed up branches for nfs-utils and portmap that address
> this issue in natty. The open merge proposal for nfs-utils is dependent
> on the portmap package due to the new portmap-wait and portmap-boot
> upstart jobs.
I've yet to look at the branch to see what changes have been made but
perhaps you can tell me, is this accomplished all with modifications to
upstart scripts or other feasibly editable (i.e. text) files?
If so, I can try porting your changes back to one of my several maverick
(or lucid even -- this should get backported to lucid, which is the LTS
release, afterall ---in any case, right?) systems that has problems with
statd not getting started properly.
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 20:34 +0000, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Alright I've pushed up branches for nfs-utils and portmap that address
> this issue in natty. The open merge proposal for nfs-utils is dependent
> on the portmap package due to the new portmap-wait and portmap-boot
> upstart jobs.
I've yet to look at the branch to see what changes have been made but
perhaps you can tell me, is this accomplished all with modifications to
upstart scripts or other feasibly editable (i.e. text) files?
If so, I can try porting your changes back to one of my several maverick
(or lucid even -- this should get backported to lucid, which is the LTS
release, afterall ---in any case, right?) systems that has problems with
statd not getting started properly.