On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:29:29AM -0000, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2009/1/29 Alexander Sack <email address hidden>:
> > Michael, what's your opinion on "status" for init.d script?
>
> The Debian network-manager init script has a "status" option.
>
> Which reminds me, that it would probably be a good idea if Debian and
> Ubuntu used the same name for the sysv init script (NetworkManager vs.
> network-manager).
>
> Would you mind merging the Debian 0.7.0 packages?
> I think they have some nice improvements (general cruft removal from
> debian/, symbols files, updated to newer Debian policy (e.g. Homepage
> field and stuff).
>
I suggestd multiple times to join our efforts, but you never opted
into it ... usually debian is behind which is why i suggested to use
the ubuntu branches to work on.
For the sake of getting this done, I am fine to move this in a debian
hosted archive. Only technical issue is svn. Merging and doing distro
specific branches is just too cumbersome that it stays efficient imo.
Of course I would prefer to go for launchpad, but given that new NM is
in git, we can just go for alioth git. Please give me heads up what
you think.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:29:29AM -0000, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2009/1/29 Alexander Sack <email address hidden>:
> > Michael, what's your opinion on "status" for init.d script?
>
> The Debian network-manager init script has a "status" option.
>
> Which reminds me, that it would probably be a good idea if Debian and
> Ubuntu used the same name for the sysv init script (NetworkManager vs.
> network-manager).
>
> Would you mind merging the Debian 0.7.0 packages?
> I think they have some nice improvements (general cruft removal from
> debian/, symbols files, updated to newer Debian policy (e.g. Homepage
> field and stuff).
>
I suggestd multiple times to join our efforts, but you never opted
into it ... usually debian is behind which is why i suggested to use
the ubuntu branches to work on.
For the sake of getting this done, I am fine to move this in a debian
hosted archive. Only technical issue is svn. Merging and doing distro
specific branches is just too cumbersome that it stays efficient imo.
Of course I would prefer to go for launchpad, but given that new NM is
in git, we can just go for alioth git. Please give me heads up what
you think.
- Alexander