On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, John Vivirito <email address hidden> wrote:
> I dont see any reason why mplayer(standalone app) should depend on
> xulrunner nor browsers since it doesnt need them i think we should
> downgrade all browser deps and xulrunner depsto recommends
mplayer doesn't depend on any browser, or browser-related library.
As for the mozilla-mplayer, we could either move browser-related
Depends to Recommends, or include all browser in one OR Depends. The
latter might be a bit wrong in one extreme case:
- new browser package, named browser-package, gets into Ubuntu archives
- user wants to use only browser-package, which is compatible with
mozilla-mplayer
- unfortunately, browser-package still isn't added to that OR browser
Depends, so user is forced to install some other browser, too
It is a very rare situation, but it can happen :).
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM, John Vivirito <email address hidden> wrote:
> I dont see any reason why mplayer(standalone app) should depend on
> xulrunner nor browsers since it doesnt need them i think we should
> downgrade all browser deps and xulrunner depsto recommends
mplayer doesn't depend on any browser, or browser-related library.
As for the mozilla-mplayer, we could either move browser-related
Depends to Recommends, or include all browser in one OR Depends. The
latter might be a bit wrong in one extreme case:
- new browser package, named browser-package, gets into Ubuntu archives
- user wants to use only browser-package, which is compatible with
mozilla-mplayer
- unfortunately, browser-package still isn't added to that OR browser
Depends, so user is forced to install some other browser, too
It is a very rare situation, but it can happen :).
--
Best regards,
Saša Bodiroža