On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:02 +0000, Alasdair G. Kergon wrote:
> Advise against that - none of the recent upstream releases has been stable.
> 2.02.38 (depends on a dm update too) might be OK.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the heads up.
Does lvm2 .38 require devmapper 1.02.26?
I'll file a bug in Debian asking for .38 to be uploaded, and give it a
bit of time before I consider proceeding with a direct upload.
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:02 +0000, Alasdair G. Kergon wrote:
> Advise against that - none of the recent upstream releases has been stable.
> 2.02.38 (depends on a dm update too) might be OK.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the heads up.
Does lvm2 .38 require devmapper 1.02.26?
I'll file a bug in Debian asking for .38 to be uploaded, and give it a
bit of time before I consider proceeding with a direct upload.
Thanks,
James