On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:07:40PM -0000, Jeremy Foshee wrote:
> The Ubuntu Kernel Team is focused on providing the most stable kernel
> possible for a release schedule of 6 months.
Is there a document online, beyond this bug, that discusses where the
kernel team's support goals differ from the distribution itself? IMO, a 6
month support schedule for the kernel adversely affects the reputation of
a release with the LTS monicker.
Note that I understand that managing kernel packages for Ubuntu is an
incredibly complex task and this bug isn't doing you any favors, but I
think that if you're going to hedge your bets so to speak on the support
duration, "LTS" should be qualified in some way.
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:07:40PM -0000, Jeremy Foshee wrote:
> The Ubuntu Kernel Team is focused on providing the most stable kernel
> possible for a release schedule of 6 months.
Is there a document online, beyond this bug, that discusses where the
kernel team's support goals differ from the distribution itself? IMO, a 6
month support schedule for the kernel adversely affects the reputation of
a release with the LTS monicker.
Note that I understand that managing kernel packages for Ubuntu is an
incredibly complex task and this bug isn't doing you any favors, but I
think that if you're going to hedge your bets so to speak on the support
duration, "LTS" should be qualified in some way.
Ryan