(In reply to comment #7) > Does Option "AGPMode" "1"... No, unlike "AGPMode" "2", "1" does not freeze the system. Again, with USB-Receiver it stays stable.
Anyway here's /proc/interrupts before manually entering runlevel 5: --------------- CPU0 0: 29205 XT-PIC-XT timer 1: 800 XT-PIC-XT i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade 6: 0 XT-PIC-XT uhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb3, eth 9: 96883 XT-PIC-XT acpi 10: 23709 XT-PIC-XT ehci_hcd:usb4, firewire_ohci, ipw2200, Intel 82801DB-ICH4 12: 132 XT-PIC-XT i8042 14: 3070 XT-PIC-XT ide0 15: 2774 XT-PIC-XT ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 ---------------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Does Option "AGPMode" "1"...
No, unlike "AGPMode" "2", "1" does not freeze the system. Again, with USB-Receiver it stays stable.
Anyway here's /proc/interrupts before manually entering runlevel 5:
---------------
CPU0
0: 29205 XT-PIC-XT timer
1: 800 XT-PIC-XT i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade
6: 0 XT-PIC-XT uhci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb3, eth
9: 96883 XT-PIC-XT acpi
10: 23709 XT-PIC-XT ehci_hcd:usb4, firewire_ohci, ipw2200, Intel 82801DB-ICH4
12: 132 XT-PIC-XT i8042
14: 3070 XT-PIC-XT ide0
15: 2774 XT-PIC-XT ide1
NMI: 0
ERR: 0
---------------