Comment 10 for bug 1974433

Revision history for this message
Frank Heimes (fheimes) wrote :

Hi Thomas, thx for the verification.

Well, this is (kind of) expected for now.

The request to validate (in comment #7 above: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1974433/comments/7) was so far for jammy aka Ubuntu 22.04 only.

A separate comment will be added once an updated kernel to verify on focal aka 20.04 is available,
but that hasn't happened yet - sorry.

Nevertheless, I checked the patches - and they are content-wise all the same (focal master-next, jammy master-next, upstream and the two you've attached).

And I also checked their status in our git trees:

Jammy/22.04 master-next:
$ git log --oneline --grep "Export the extended counter set counters"
$ 4834ef0731bd s390/cpumf: add new extended counter set for IBM z16
git tag --contains 4834ef0731bd
Ubuntu-5.15.0-36.37

Focal/20.04 master-next:
$ git log --oneline --grep "Export the extended counter set counters"
1f583d5cba70 s390/cpumf: add new extended counter set for IBM z16
$ git tag --contains 1f583d5cba70
Ubuntu-5.4.0-116.130

And these are the kernels available in jammy-proposed and focal-proposed as of today:
$ rmadison --arch=s390x linux-generic | egrep 'jammy-proposed|focal-proposed'
 linux-generic | 5.4.0.115.119 | focal-proposed | s390x
 linux-generic | 5.15.0.36.39 | jammy-proposed | s390x
(please ignore the right most digit for now)

'5.15.0.36' fits to the jammy git look-up, hence is included (and you could verify it)

But '5.4.0.115' is one version older than the focal git look-up: 5.4.0-116, hence not included yet (so you weren't able to verify it)

So we need to wait a little bit for the next updated focal kernel, and once available in focal-proposed, an additional comment will be added here.

(I hope you haven't wasted much time on focal yet ...)