Perhaps it's related with 2.6.24-8 is the first tickless (CONFIG_NO_HZ) kernel.
I don't use synergyc, so I can't test it, but I didn't noticed any network problem with this kernel yet.
Perhaps it's related with 2.6.24-8 is the first tickless (CONFIG_NO_HZ) kernel.
I don't use synergyc, so I can't test it, but I didn't noticed any network problem with this kernel yet.