On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:38 +0000, Mike Rooney wrote:
> Hi James! Just for the less educated like myself, I wanted to clarify
> what you meant. By .27 do you mean linux 2.6.27, because I wasn't
> aware that that was going to make it into Intrepid. Am I incorrect on
> either of these? Thanks!
>
Hi Mike,
Yes, that's what I meant. Perhaps I was wrong about it being likely
for Intrepid then. I'm using BenC's intrepid-next debs, and so I
assumed that they were planning on moving to .27.
A quick search shows that you are correct. I'm sorry for spreading
mis-information.
It would be great to backport ath5k from .27, in l-b-m if need be.
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:38 +0000, Mike Rooney wrote:
> Hi James! Just for the less educated like myself, I wanted to clarify
> what you meant. By .27 do you mean linux 2.6.27, because I wasn't
> aware that that was going to make it into Intrepid. Am I incorrect on
> either of these? Thanks!
>
Hi Mike,
Yes, that's what I meant. Perhaps I was wrong about it being likely
for Intrepid then. I'm using BenC's intrepid-next debs, and so I
assumed that they were planning on moving to .27.
A quick search shows that you are correct. I'm sorry for spreading
mis-information.
It would be great to backport ath5k from .27, in l-b-m if need be.
Thanks,
James