> The fix DaMiEn667 mentioned in comment #28 never seems to have been
> mainlined.
>
> I just did a quick test with the latest omap tree:
> commit: c7769fdf6a9c87c6c3ddca0103566eabc5e4db01
>
> The underflwo now longer occurs, so I think the problem has already
> been fixed upstream.
Could you bisect the upstream tree to find the fix? Note that you
should invert the logic i.e. mark the working commits as bad and the
non-working ones as good.
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Andy Doan wrote:
> The fix DaMiEn667 mentioned in comment #28 never seems to have been 6c3ddca0103566e abc5e4db01
> mainlined.
>
> I just did a quick test with the latest omap tree:
> commit: c7769fdf6a9c87c
>
> The underflwo now longer occurs, so I think the problem has already
> been fixed upstream.
Could you bisect the upstream tree to find the fix? Note that you
should invert the logic i.e. mark the working commits as bad and the
non-working ones as good.