On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:44, Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
> Rogério Theodoro de Brito [2010-04-15 9:01 -0000]:
>> This is strange. What platform are you testing this with? Any
>> big-endian? I can try to experiment with what you have.
>
> amd64, just like you..
No, I observed the problem with a big-endian machine (a powerpc).
Would you like any extra details? Perhaps we have more than one
problem, then. Did you happen to use gdb to find out where the problem
comes from?
I am, right now, using a i386, but I have here in this room both an
amd64 and a powerpc. With the i386 and the powerpc, I don't see any
problems with the patch (any of them) applied.
If you suspect that the problem is indeed at the same place of the
problem of the cast, can you see what value the variable contain?
Hi, Martin.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:44, Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
> Rogério Theodoro de Brito [2010-04-15 9:01 -0000]:
>> This is strange. What platform are you testing this with? Any
>> big-endian? I can try to experiment with what you have.
>
> amd64, just like you..
No, I observed the problem with a big-endian machine (a powerpc).
Would you like any extra details? Perhaps we have more than one
problem, then. Did you happen to use gdb to find out where the problem
comes from?
I am, right now, using a i386, but I have here in this room both an
amd64 and a powerpc. With the i386 and the powerpc, I don't see any
problems with the patch (any of them) applied.
If you suspect that the problem is indeed at the same place of the
problem of the cast, can you see what value the variable contain?
Regards, Rogério Brito.
-- {mackenzie, ime.usp} .br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 www.ime. usp.br/ ~rbrito : http:// meusite. mackenzie. com.br/ rbrito berlios. de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth. debian. org
Rogério Brito : rbrito@
http://
Projects: algorithms.