On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Alkis Georgopoulos <email address hidden> wrote:
> I read in LP #128447 that
> * installing libsdl1.2debian-all instead of libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio,
> * and setting SDL_AUDIODRIVER=pulse in the environment
> would have about the same results as installing libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio.
>
> I tried it and it works fine for me.
>
> So maybe instead of requesting for libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio to be the
> default in Ubuntu, while libsdl1.2debian-alsa to remain the default in
> [K|X]ubuntu, maybe all derivatives could use libsdl1.2debian-all
> instead, and Ubuntu specifically to have SDL_AUDIODRIVER=pulse set in
> the environment? (libsdl1.2debian-all is in main)
>
> --
> libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio must be installed as default by libsdl1.2debian
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203158
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
That's a nice approach,
Happy New Year !
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Alkis Georgopoulos <email address hidden> wrote:
> I read in LP #128447 that 2debian- pulseaudio, =pulse in the environment 2debian- pulseaudio. 2debian- pulseaudio to be the 2debian- alsa to remain the default in =pulse set in 2debian- all is in main) 2debian- pulseaudio must be installed as default by libsdl1.2debian /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 203158
> * installing libsdl1.2debian-all instead of libsdl1.
> * and setting SDL_AUDIODRIVER
> would have about the same results as installing libsdl1.
>
> I tried it and it works fine for me.
>
> So maybe instead of requesting for libsdl1.
> default in Ubuntu, while libsdl1.
> [K|X]ubuntu, maybe all derivatives could use libsdl1.2debian-all
> instead, and Ubuntu specifically to have SDL_AUDIODRIVER
> the environment? (libsdl1.
>
> --
> libsdl1.
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>