Comment 1 for bug 2044019

Hi Rico,

Thanks for the nice and detailed SRU template, and all the testing.

While looking at this, particularly the changes in the packaging,
there are a few points that seem to warrant clarification, since
are apparently not related/supporting the upstream bug fixes, or
are not justified as to why included in a SRU (ie, which issues
or bugs are being addressed).

I checked most of these points with Andreas yesterday, and he too
agreed more details would be required before proceeding with this.

Could please address the points below? That's very appreciated.

Thanks again for all the effort on this!

cheers,
Mauricio

...

Changes:

$ debdiff libreoffice_7.6.2-0ubuntu1.dsc libreoffice_7.6.3-0ubuntu0.23.10.1.dsc | filterdiff -i '*/debian/*'

There are some changes in debian/ that may warrant some clarification
as they do not fit into the SRU policy for minor release updates
(ie, bug-fix only) or to be related to the bugs fixed by upstream
(ie, to support a bug-fix).

I've looked for similarities in the changelog of previous releases,
but apparently haven't found them as precedents. This is the first
time I'm looking at this package, so I might be missing something.

I'll note specific changes in changelog/rules below, for clarity.

1)

d/changelog

 18 + - don't try to install dbreport config modules into
 19 + -uiconfig-report-builder if the report builder is disabled

d/rules

413 +ifeq "$(ENABLE_REPORTBUILDER)" "y"
414 mv $(PKGDIR)-common/$(OODIR)/share/config/soffice.cfg/modules/dbreport \
415 $(PKGDIR)-uiconfig-report-builder/$(OODIR)/share/config/soffice.cfg/modules
416 +else
417 + rm -rf $(PKGDIR)-common/$(OODIR)/share/config/soffice.cfg/modules/dbreport
418 +endif

Is this possibly a separate bug, as apparently it's not related to
an upstream bug fix; it would be nice to have some clarification.

Maybe this is covered in the SRU policy under "it is also acceptable to upload new microreleases with many bug fixes without individual Launchpad bugs for each of them", but I considered such 'many bug fixes' to be related to the upstream bugs, and this change is on packaging.

2)

d/changelog

 20 + - switch OOO_BASE_ARCHS/OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS variables
 21 + (build base on all architectures instead of Java architectures
 22 + and report-builder-* only on archs where Java is enabled, not on
 23 + "all base archs"); there's -sdbc-{mysql,postgresql,firebird} anyway

d/rules

356 -OOO_BASE_ARCHS := $(OOO_JAVA_ARCHS)
357 +OOO_BASE_ARCHS := $(OOO_ARCHS)
358 $(eval $(call gen_no_archs,OOO_BASE_ARCHS))
359 -OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS := $(OOO_BASE_ARCHS)
360 +OOO_REPORTBUILDER_ARCHS := $(OOO_JAVA_ARCHS)

Similarly; it would be nice to have some clarification,
and perhaps explain the trailing note about '-sdbc-* anyway'.

3)

d/changelog

 24 + - don't try to build Jar_{OOoRunner,test,ConnectivityTools} if Java is
 25 + disabled as an extra safety net (instead of checking for junit only)

Similary, it would be nice to have some clarification.

d/rules

399 -ifeq "$(BUILD_TEST_PACKAGES)" "y"
400 - ifeq "$(ENABLE_JUNIT4)" "y"
401 +ifeq "$(ENABLE_JAVA)" "y"
402 + ifeq "$(BUILD_TEST_PACKAGES)" "y"
403 + ifeq "$(ENABLE_JUNIT4)" "y"
404 PATH=$(BUILD_PATH) LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(BUILD_LD_LIBRARY_PATH) ARCH_FLAGS=$(ARCH_FLAGS) TMP=`mktemp -q -d` $(MAKE) Jar_{OOoRunner,tes t,ConnectivityTools}
405 + endif

4)

d/changelog

 26 + - re-enable cmis; bump libcmis build-dep to >= 0.6.1

Similarly; it would be nice to have some clarification.
And also the reason to enable it in an SRU? Maybe some relation to
an upstream bug or ubuntu bug? Any changes at behavior/runtime?
(apparently just an internal build dep; why is this needed, and
isn't the archive version (older) sufficient?)

d/rules

343 @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@
344 DICT_DIR=/usr/share/hunspell
345 HYPH_DIR=/usr/share/hyphen
346 THES_DIR=/usr/share/mythes
347 -ENABLE_LIBCMIS=n
348 +ENABLE_LIBCMIS=y

386 @@ -1423,7 +1429,7 @@
387 endif
388 ifeq "$(ENABLE_LIBCMIS)" "y"
389 ifneq (,$(filter libcmis, $(SYSTEM_STUFF)))
390 - BUILD_DEPS += , libcmis-dev (>= 0.5.2~), libcmis-dev (<< 0.6~)
391 + BUILD_DEPS += , libcmis-dev (>= 0.6.1~), libcmis-dev (<< 0.7~)
392 endif
393 else
394 CONFIGURE_FLAGS += --disable-libcmis

5)

 27 + - build against libcurl4-openssl-dev instead of gnutls

334 @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@
335 USE_GSTREAMER=y
336 endif
337 ENABLE_CURL=y
338 -CURL_SECTYPE=gnutls
339 +CURL_SECTYPE=openssl

Similarly; it would be nice to have some clarification on its reason,
and potential changes to runtime behavior or functionality.

This is a significant change.

6)

 30 + * debian/control.ure.in:
 31 + - make ure-java actutally Architecture: %OOO_JAVA_ARCHS%

Similarly, it would be nice to have some clarification.