Comment 3 for bug 59663
Revision history for this message
| Enrique Matías Sánchez (aka Quique) (cronopios) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
2006/9/9, Andrew Ash:
> Can you provide a link/location to where the libgpod developers told you
> that such a dependency is unnecessary? I'm having a hard time finding
> this information on their website.
Yes, I can. I asked in the gtkpod-devel mailing list:
https:/
https:/
> If it is an optional dependency, then what does that package allow
> libgpod to do?
«Working with artwork» (I just don't know what that artwork support
consists of).
--
Do we have to destroy our freedom in order to save it?
Data retention is no solution.