lazr.restfulclient *should* depend on lazr.uri (LP: #876445). But there are other lazr packages in Ubuntu (only).
Piotr thinks that dh_python2's namespace feature will be sufficient for this. That way we avoid a top level empty package (there's no obvious binary package to build it from). the lazr stack may be unimportable during upgrades, would that be an issue?
lazr.restfulclient *should* depend on lazr.uri (LP: #876445). But there are other lazr packages in Ubuntu (only).
Piotr thinks that dh_python2's namespace feature will be sufficient for this. That way we avoid a top level empty package (there's no obvious binary package to build it from). the lazr stack may be unimportable during upgrades, would that be an issue?