On 05/08/2011 03:23 AM, Ahmad Syukri wrote:
> arne, can you explain why the zh-* selectors do not have the <test
> name="lang"> comparison like the one in ja-jp?
>
At the time when the files were made, the <test name="lang"> test didn't
work reliably, at least I couldn't get it to work. If it works reliably
now and you can give me a test case which proves this, then I can change it.
However, I would rather prefer to have a consensus in Debian/Ubuntu on
how to handle the fontconfig configuration in general. Upstream
fontconfig includes a list of more or less suitable fonts, but sais the
distribution should adjust the list if necessary. Neither Debian nor
Ubuntu do that currently and leave everything to the font package
maintainers. I'm unhappy with this situation and would like to get this
solved once and for all.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2011 03:23 AM, Ahmad Syukri wrote:
> arne, can you explain why the zh-* selectors do not have the <test
> name="lang"> comparison like the one in ja-jp?
>
At the time when the files were made, the <test name="lang"> test didn't
work reliably, at least I couldn't get it to work. If it works reliably
now and you can give me a test case which proves this, then I can change it.
However, I would rather prefer to have a consensus in Debian/Ubuntu on
how to handle the fontconfig configuration in general. Upstream
fontconfig includes a list of more or less suitable fonts, but sais the
distribution should adjust the list if necessary. Neither Debian nor
Ubuntu do that currently and leave everything to the font package
maintainers. I'm unhappy with this situation and would like to get this
solved once and for all.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
Nxc/TAAoJENiwmJ tstTzshEEQAJF7u a1qxPqfoQ3QPaal +YrE ZeqZj4J45058QbY PuMQ9qlUvYc+ BLHcHohHk8iTY4+ KrxWEI9 Ug3lOJc/ O8NwjJb+ pfHdTpeBTYJv9ke hRlYAWtkYTm2J2x EvQ GgtZCqZ6ybG4LOj /VzXPWdQB5iSOh7 6+ciR// h7jyIM9X9TMI dn4OuBIloPfMRm2 izQJLFvJciLu54C 1oW00WD1WGvn8vW 9UaH ZILF2sKozFOgpnm 3yWe5IhfObB0Emi 9coMttU9kTs3ym9 Ay89 KE07OXk/ XkFd7apGxbIHplv skobrp8t6QNNd6I edgCStHfwG/ HPL/uk15Jh4XfxJ Y8EvOuPk6jNaLKh e0tC0ogmZAl3rYT 8wCl 6/PvZspFUz37fl+ cf8jR7PhKP3cBty nVMOWbR6pKuqdlB Xl0mX43 85TEOTij7bYY6jk LDcaRLGzQ86o8Qk Y5XEXBCO0eaTJSg lVc/ iaJMpmqonJjgOvC hFLN16DhLp4fA1V WiM8Vzh3lwcFjmj YuUU wTtRg
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJ
WGrwNONmSCuVPoz
dZg281EsOfMAsRt
xtAwvPbR8ey00SH
gShhHqHjT1hMd3k
do7DAbovWX0YSUG
kRklfpm653n3t7C
EszKWgS7kmmFXIT
wRMSIG6JDiA+
k6kHrJd8HEtOED0
jd3/+seUkQ2MGF4
GBtWE2grWyO4gyO
=qt9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----